AltFi.com uses cookies on this website. They help us to know a little bit about how you use our website, which improves the browsing experience and marketing - both for you and for others. They are stored locally on your device. By continuing to use this site you accept this use of cookies. Go to the Privacy and Cookies page for more information. You'll see this message only once.
Not signed in. Log in here.

Your daily download of all things alternative finance and fintech, from us at AltFi


 

Mapping out the Funds Universe Part 1




By Sam Hodges on 20th November 2015


Over the next couple of weeks in two articles we’re going to shine a light on the fast expanding mini-universe of London stock market listed funds investing in P2P loans and direct loans to small businesses.

 

Using numbers from investment trust analysts at Numis, we can clearly see from the various detailed tables below that this universe is now valued at over £1.5 billion – a remarkable number given that just under two years ago there were no funds at all, not the six that feature in the tables below.

 

Just to recap on why this sector has expanded as it has. The original fund – and still the biggest by a very long stretch at a market cap of just under £900m - was P2P Global Investments, managed by Eaglewood Europe and backed by hedge fund Marshall Wace.

 

If we look at the original investment strategy for this market leader we can see all the arguments for investing in a fund. In simple terms you get diversified access to lots of different platforms in the UK and globally, with customers that range from consumers through small businesses. In one fund, you in effect, get access to tens of thousands of different loans.

 

These are of course income focused vehicles, with the yields (or at very least targeted yields) varying between 6 and 10% depending on the underlying borrower.

 

Obviously these rates seem very attractive when compared to the market leading P2P lending platforms such as Zopa, Ratesetter and Funding Circle. The first two are focused on consumer lending and don’t offer anything above 6% whereas Funding Circle does offer the prospect of a blended yield of between 6.5 and 7%. Most of the funds here offer rates above that level but you also need to remember that you are taking some specific risks with a listed fund.

 

In no particular order we’d remind you that

  1. You don’t benefit from any protection fund offered by the likes of Ratesetter and Zopa
  2. You’re also investing in a share that is traded on the stockmarket which can be volatile in price and expensive to trade in (broking fees, bid offer spreads and fund management fees can all add up)
  3. You are also particularly vulnerable to a fund moving from a premium to a discount. This sounds complicated but simply describes the relationship between the total value of assets in the fund and the market value or cap of the entire fund. If the market cap is valued at more than the underlying assets, the fund is trading at a premium, with the opposite a discount. Shifts between premiums and discounts can be dramatic and can damage your wealth. Take P2PGI for instance. If you’d have bought at the height of its premium you’d have endured a 19% premium whereas now the fund trades at a small discount. For more details on this see the first table below.

There is no right or wrong way to invest in p2p lending.

 

Some will prefer the direct platform approach, others (especially institutions) the fund approach. 

 

   

Key Trading Details : Part 1

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Price

NAV per Share

% Premium(+)/Discount(-)

 

 

 

   

Last

Estimate

Now

Avg

High

Low

GLAF

GLI Alternative Finance

102.3

100.2

2.1

3.5

4.3

2.1

P2P

P2P Global Investment

993.0

1,000.3

-0.7

9.2

19.2

-4.8

P2P2

P2P Global Investment C

983.0

990.2

-0.7

0.9

4.5

-4.1

RDL

Ranger Direct Lending

1,012.0

983.6

2.9

7.2

11.5

1.4

VSL

VPC Specialty Lending

97.0

98.3

-1.3

2.5

6.9

-4.8

VSLC

VPC Specialty Lending C

92.8

98.0

-5.4

-1.7

2.0

-6.1

 

 

What we would say is that there has been a dramatic de rating of the sector by market investors. Premiums across the sector were very high at one point – probably unsafely so in our opinion. Now we can see that all six funds bar one, are trading at a discount. Our sense is that these vehicles should only ever trade at either the net asset value or slightly under.

 

The good news is that all the funds seem to be hitting their yield targets, with most paying out quarterly. But we’d also observe that the bid offer spread – the difference between the buying and selling price per share – is rather high in some cases with GLI Alternative Finance at over 2% (although it is the smallest fund in the space). 

 

   

Key Trading Details: Part 2

 

   

Share Class £m

Bid/Offer

Yield

 

Launch

   

Mkt Cap

Net Ass.

Spread %

 

Frequency

Date

GLAF

GLI Alternative Finance

54

53

2.4%

7.8

Monthly

Sep-15

P2P

P2P Global Investment

464

468

0.4%

6.3

Qtly

May-14

P2P2

P2P Global Investment C

393

396

0.8%

0.0

Qtly

Jul-15

RDL

Ranger Direct Lending

137

133

1.2%

9.9

Qtly

May-15

VSL

VPC Specialty Lending

194

197

0.8%

8.2

Qtly

Mar-15

VSLC

VPC Specialty Lending C

170

179

1.7%

0.0

Qtly

Oct-15

 

How have these funds performed? The next table below again from Numis tells a worrying story. It shows price returns over various periods – not changes in the underlying net asset value of the loans. We’ve also included the various additional C issues for VPC and P2P (with Ranger currently also looking to raise extra money). Pretty much across the board we’ve seen noticeable price declines over the last month (figures are through to Thursday 19th November) and even bigger losses over the six month period. Over the last year P2PGI is down by 4.2%.

 

These are meant to be permanent capital vehicles which means that 1 or 6 month performance numbers should be taken with a pinch of salt and arguably shouldn’t matter anyway for those with a 5 to 10 year time horizon – and those price returns also ignore the dividends you would have banked. We’d also observe that changes in underlying NAV aren’t substantial which all points to one important story – many investors might have sold the shares because they thought the premiums were too high.  We’d be worried if these price declines continued in the next six months and discounts started moving beyond 5 or even 10%. At the moment though we think the story is a simple one – investors have become more realistic about the sector and stopped putting silly prices on the shares. 

 

   

 Performance

 

 

   

 

   

Ytd

1m

3m

6m

1y

GLAF

GLI Alternative Finance

-

0.0

-

-

-

P2P

P2P Global Investment

-11.2

-0.3

-4.1

-8.0

-4.2

P2P2

P2P Global Investment C

-

-0.7

-3.1

-

-

RDL

Ranger Direct Lending

-

-3.5

-4.9

-2.1

-

VSL

VPC Specialty Lending

-

-2.6

-2.7

-0.7

-

VSLC

VPC Specialty Lending C

-

-6.4

-

-

-

 

Another important fact is that all these funds operate with very different mandates. The table below shows the websites for each of the funds. We’d suggest that all readers visit these online, check out the monthly fact sheets and statements and really understand what you might be putting your money  into. GLI Alternative Finance for instance is very focused on small business p2p platforms from within the GLI Finance stable. That’s very different to Ranger which doesn’t focus on p2p loans at all, and prefers to make direct loans. Both VPC and P2P GI are much broader in focus and lend to both consumers and businesses. These latter two funds are also very much bigger and truly global.

 

   

Website

 

Direct Lending

 

GLAF

GLI Alternative Finance

www.glialternativefinance.com

P2P

P2P Global Investment

www.p2pgi.com/

P2P2

P2P Global Investment C

www.p2pgi.com/

RDL

Ranger Direct Lending

www.rangerdirectlending.com/ranger-direct-lending-fund/

VSL

VPC Specialty Lending

www.vpcspecialtylending.com

VSLC

VPC Specialty Lending C

www.vpcspecialtylending.com

 

The one area where there isn’t much variation is in charging – nearly all the funds (again bar GLI Alternative Finance) charge a base management fee of 1% plus performance fees in some cases. This isn’t extortionate but it’s not cheap. Many bond funds for instance stuffed full of fixed income investments look to charge well below 1% although these securities are arguably easier to research and trade in. If discounts do start to grow we wouldn’t be surprised to see pressure on those fund management costs, perhaps pushing them closer to 0.75%.

 

The one good bit of news – summed up in the table below which also looks at fees – is that the big institutions that backed many of these funds still seem to be ‘on board’. Neil Woodford’s fund management business is a sector champion as is Invesco, Aviva and M&G. We’d hope these big shareholders stay loyal, and over time we’d expect more funds to emerge.

 

 

 

 

Basic Fee %

Key Shareholders

 

Debt

 

 

 

Direct Lending

 

 

GLAF

GLI Alternative Finance

0.75%/0.5%

76.4% GLI Finance, Ltd., 5.7% Morgan Stanley Investment Management Ltd. (UK)

P2P

P2P Global Investment

1.00%

13.9% Woodford Investment Management LLP, 8.7% INVESCO Asset Management Limited

P2P2

P2P Global Investment C

1.00%

3.3% Premier Asset Management Ltd, 2.2% Deutsche Bank Private Wealth Management Limited

RDL

Ranger Direct Lending

1.00%

29.5% INVESCO Asset Management Limited, 9.9% BMO Global Asset Management, 5.8% Aviva

VSL

VPC Speciality Lending

1.00%

19.5% Woodford Investment Management LLP, 19.4% CF Woodford Equity Income Fund

VSLC

VPC Speciality Lending C

1.00%

NR

 

Our bottom line? Next week we’ll look at these funds in comparison against other obvious alternatives such as bonds and mainstream equities plus investing directly in platforms such as Zopa, Ratesetter and Funding Circle. But without wanting to steal the thunder of that forthcoming article, we’d say that the recent price declines are healthy and have helped put the whole sector on a sensible even keel. Big premiums to net asset value were always dangerous and we’re glad that the sector is now trading back at a bit below par. If those income targets can be met, big institutional investors will probably remain committed although no one really knows what impact rising interest rates and even a recession could have  on the underlying business dynamics of the fast growing p2p lending markets.

Comments


Enter your name:

Enter a comment in the box below:

More like this:

Ranger to Raise up to £135m via C Share Issue
10th November 2015
Ryan Weeks
US Platform Fund to List in the UK?
10th February 2016
Ryan Weeks
The Age of the Closed End Fund
23rd July 2015
Ryan Weeks
GLI Fund Launches
22nd September 2015
Ryan Weeks