AltFi.com uses cookies on this website. They help us to know a little bit about how you use our website, which improves the browsing experience and marketing - both for you and for others. They are stored locally on your device. By continuing to use this site you accept this use of cookies. Go to the Privacy and Cookies page for more information. You'll see this message only once.
Not signed in. Log in here.

Your daily download of all things alternative finance and fintech, from us at AltFi


 

Over 88 per cent of equity crowdfunded companies still trading, finds report




By Ryan Weeks on 8th November 2016


Latest equity crowdfunding report from AltFi Data calculates 19.14 per cent IRR for industry.

 

The latest “Where are they now?” report, AltFi Data’s annual pulse check for equity crowdfunded companies, has revealed strong performance across the sector. The first iteration of the report – which was published this time last year – represented the first attempt to deliver a portfolio view of performance across the equity crowdfunding sector. The industry IRR, at that stage, was calculated at 2.17 per cent, increasing to 33.79 per cent when tax-adjusted.

 

Since then, the FCA – as part of its post-implementation review process – put the industry on watch, stating the following:

 

“Based on the outcome of the review, to help potential investors better understand the risks, we could consider whether to mandate additional disclosures, for example setting out how many businesses that raised funds have since failed and how many have had successful pay-outs.”

 

Seedrs became the first platform to carry out a “Where are they now?” style analysis on its own portfolio in September of this year. The platform calculated a 14.44 per cent IRR for its portfolio of early stage investments, rising to 41.87 per cent when tax-adjusted.

 

The latest report from AltFi Data, which was published this morning, is fuelled by a far richer data set than was available for the 2015 iteration. The report drew on data from 955 capital raises, spread across 751 companies, up from just 367 companies last year. To date, just 88 of those 955 raises have ended in failure, while 5 have delivered exits.

 

Taking a year-by-year view, 2013 is perhaps the most indicative cohort in terms of striking a balance between volume and maturity. 63 per cent of the companies in the cohort (which as a whole accounts for a little shy of £20m of origination) are still trading. Almost half of those have staged up-rounds, meaning that they’ve gone on to raise more money at a higher valuation. But the number of failures found by AltFi Data in the 2013 cohort has essentially doubled since last year’s analysis, from around 15 per cent in 2015 to a little over 30 per cent today.

 

More recent cohorts are performing well, but this is, at this early stage, to be expected. It’s important to bear in mind that the 2013 cohort is significantly smaller in terms of volume than the 2014 and 2015 cohorts (less than £20m in volume versus nearly £80m and more than £150m respectively).

 

Speaking at this morning’s launch event at Nabarro, AltFi Data CEO Rupert Taylor noted that, while not significant at this stage, problems appear to emerging sooner for the sector’s most recent cohorts. He said that it was “quite early for problems to have emerged” in the 2016 cohort, which has already seen a few failures.

 

As a more general point on volume, the report finds that equity crowdfunding sector originations have slowed in 2016. According to the report: “2016 looks set to be the first year in which the full year origination amount is dwarfed by the previous year.” Q3 2016 origination was particularly slow, with AltFi Data citing uncertainty stemming from Brexit as a significant factor.

 

AltFi Data’s portfolio return calculation of 8.55 per cent across the industry factors in changes in valuations and dilution (caused by the new issue of shares). When factoring in the effect of EIS/SEIS reliefs, which apply to a large proportion of equity crowdfunding campaigns, the IRR rises to 19.14 per cent. The report covers the sector’s largest six platforms: Crowdcube, Seedrs, SyndicateRoom, VentureFounders, CODE Investing, Angels Den.

 

Other highlights from the report include:

 

  • The data shows that consumer facing businesses in general are the most popular within the sector: “The emerging sector bias is not towards the consumer sectors specifically but towards consumer facing businesses in general whatever the sector.”
  • The overall trend in average age of company at time of fundraising has remained relatively flat throughout the industry’s lifetime. But VentureFounders, a more recently launched platform, stands out from the pack in this regard, with an average age of fundraiser of over 10 years.
  • VentureFounders also stood out in terms of average size of fundraise, at just under £2m, versus a £447k figure across the industry in 2016.
  • We also learned more about individual platform specialisms:
    • Crowdcube continues to dominate the consumer discretionary segment.”
    • Seedrs has established a clear lead in financial businesses.”
    • SyndicateRoom has developed a clear specialisation in healthcare.”

 

Chief among AltFi Data’s conclusions in the report was the suggestion that equity crowdfunding platforms should be making this kind of portfolio-level disclosure of their own accord, regardless of whether or not the regulator requires them to. Taylor called it an “essential ingredient” in allowing individual investors to bring scrutiny to bear upon origination platforms that do not use their own capital to fund deals.

 

But Taylor also argued that the best method of delivering this kind of disclosure in a consistent and comparable way is to act via an independent third party provider. “If the industry is serious about wanting to go mainstream, it needs to make it easy for due diligence to be done,” he said.

 

Click here to download the report in full.

 

We’ve received a number of reactions to the report, which are displayed below.

 

Luke Lang, co-founder, Crowdcube:

 

“As the crowdfunding industry matures, we need a unified approach to reporting on the performance of crowdfunded businesses. AltFi’s independent and thorough analysis of the UK’s crowd portfolio is certainly a positive step for the industry and one we wholeheartedly endorse. Increased transparency of the due diligence process and ongoing performance of investments is critical for our maturing industry and investor confidence.”

 

Goncalo de Vasconcelos, CEO and co-founder, SyndicateRoom:

 

"It's been an interesting twelve months for the industry, with the highlight, for me, being the FCA's decision to review the sector.”

 

"Openness and transparency have been at the core of SyndicateRoom's ethos since it launched three years ago. We believe there should be regulation in place where investment platforms present their entire portfolio, including all details for companies - successfully completed funding rounds, to exits to those who have ceased trading. Only then will investors be truly informed and get fair and transparent access to the top deals. We need a culture shift - and we ask the crowdfunding industry to follow in our footsteps. Transparency around information available will be at the very heart of this culture and will create a sustainable market where investors are achieving their expected financial returns."

Comments

Rupert Taylor

09 Nov 2016 03:43pm

Hi Rob. Many thanks for your interest in our report. You are entirely correct - Companies House data can be significantly out of date. That is why our methodology supplements companies house submissions with a survey to allow us to define prevailing company status. Each company in the sample was surveyed over a 6 week period from mid August until end September. This allows us to provide a definitive representation of company status at end September 2016. This is exactly the same methodology as we used in last years report and is clearly explained in the 'methodology' section of the report. It results in statistics that we believe to be extremely accurate as at 31st September. With respect to AltFi's raise on Crowdcube please note that AltFi and AltFi Data are separate entities and it is AltFi that is doing the raise. But to be clear neither entity is involved in anything that in any way represents 'corruption of the statistics'!

Rob Murray Brown

09 Nov 2016 12:14pm

As always you have missed a key point. Just because a company has not been struck off the register (ie closed) at Companies House, does not mean it is still 'trading' as you headline states. It just means no one has got around to closing it - an action that can take several years to complete even without any activity. This is a corruption of the statistics and you really should know better if you want to raise your target on Crowdcube!


Enter your name:

Enter a comment in the box below: