AltFi.com uses cookies on this website. They help us to know a little bit about how you use our website, which improves the browsing experience and marketing - both for you and for others. They are stored locally on your device. By continuing to use this site you accept this use of cookies. Go to the Privacy and Cookies page for more information. You'll see this message only once.
Not signed in. Log in here.
 

Treasury clarifies whether P2P lending constitutes deposit-taking




By Ryan Weeks on 4th January 2018

Source: www.assistedseniorliving.net

A prominent sector lawyer says the clarification is very much linked to last March’s “Dear CEO” letter.

 

HMT Treasury has passed an order confirming that straight-forward peer-to-peer lending does not constitute deposit-taking. At first glance, this may seem like a moot point, but until now the rules have not been clear.

 

The order relates to the now-infamous “Dear CEO” letter, sent in March 2017, in which the FCA effectively ordered P2P platforms to cease and desist with all wholesale lending activities. The rationale was that a business borrowing money in order to lend that money on constitutes a form of deposit-taking. This was deemed illegal, per article 5, paragraph 1 of the regulated activities order.

 

But as Jonathan Segal, a partner at law firm Fox Williams, explained, the next part of that legislation is (or at least was) extremely unclear.

 

Translating, Segal said it essentially meant that “whatever else you [peer-to-peer borrowers] do with the money, you might fall within this part of the regulated activities order”. In other words, if the money comes from a peer-to-peer platform, anything from buying a property to funding a business might be considered deposit-taking.

 

Segal describes the situation as a nonsense. “If you’re just a business borrowing money on a platform, then you’re not really holding yourself out as accepting deposits in the first instance, and even if you are, you’re only doing it on one occasion – once every couple of years,” he said.

 

It is hoped that the order passed by the Treasury yesterday will remove the confusion, making it crystal clear that straight-forward peer-to-peer lending does not constitute deposit-taking.

 

“This piece of legislation adds to that order, and what it fundamentally says is: if you’re a business and you’re borrowing from a platform, you’re not deposit-taking,” explained Segal. “The borrower in this instance is not a credit institution or an authorised person, nor is it holding itself out as a deposit-taking institution day-to-day.”

 

Fox Williams is a specialist within the fintech sector, covering everything from cryptocurrencies to crowdfunding. Segal welcomes the Treasury’s order as “a good piece of legislation”, because it clarifies a technicality.

 

“If you’re a borrower and you’re going on a Funding Circle or a ThinCats, you’re clearly not deposit-taking,” he said. “If you’re doing it every week, maybe that’s different.”

 

Comments


Enter your name:

Enter a comment in the box below: